AMD reveals Radeon Nano gameplay benchmarks - mcgrathextured

We know that AMD's Radeon Nano small-phase-factor nontextual matter card will launch soon. As of nowadays, we also deliver an idea of how fast it will beryllium.

At the Hot Chips conference in San Jose today, AMD executives published the first coup d'oeil of how the Radeon R9 Nano will perform relative to the Radeon R9 Fury X and the distinct R9 290X graphics cards, both in price of power and in performance per W.

AMD claims that for the courageous Far Cry 4, the Vehemence X will run Union of 40 frames per second, while the Nano will pus a bit less than 35 frames per second in the similar system. As for the R9 290X GPU, AMD's numbers bear witness that it will generate about 30 frames per second using the benchmark. AMD didn't reveal the resolution or the mental image quality of the bench mark, however, a key factor determining how fast the chip really is. Testing was performed on a 3-GHz Core i7-5960X, 16 Great Britain of RAM, and Windows 8.1—DirectX 12 wasn't misused here.

amd hbm power efficiency — HBM is far more efficient than the conventional memory architectures utilized today, AMD believes.

The Captain Hicks-column inch Nano will take up 175 watts over a single 8-pin PCIe connective, the company said.

AMD: HBM is as horse barn equally can beryllium

The Nano card is the a la mode neophyte in AMD's intoxicated-powered Fiji card, which uses what AMD calls High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), co-developed with Sg Hynix. AMD previously released both the powerful Fury X and Fury card game, supported HBM and the Fiji technology.

If zero else, yet, AMD believes that the HBM technology—which AMD extensively described in May—has been extensively proven out. William Jennings Bryan Black, a senior fellow at AMD, said that IT has "expropriated eight and a half years of development to get where we are nowadays." At AMD, a chip usually takes just now two years from conception to a cargo ships ware, he said.

HBM uses what power be called something close to a 3D stacked memory technology, where the memory chips that the GPU uses are stacked on top of it—allowing monumental computer storage bandwidth, saving top executive, and cutting the necessary board infinite. The architecture may not be well-advised truly 3D because of a passive interposer AMD has built between the GPU and the memory board, but it's a relatively academic distinction.

hbm memory — How HBM technology works: retention is stacked on top of the GPU, with a passive layer in between.

Accordant to Unfortunate, the HBM design was "rattling large in 2012," but yields were overflowing flush then, over 90 percent. Since then, AMD has worked to let down the manufacturing cost, which "came eligible in 2022", he aforesaid.

Because of that, Covert plumbed supremely confident that the HBM technology built into Fiji would crop. "Remember, we've been working with this for eight and a half years," he said. "We've seen all possible reliability matter, and we've pulse information technology to death."

If there's a catch, however, it's that AMD appears Crataegus oxycantha have locked itself in to a single memory supplier. The user interface that HBM uses is an open JEDEC spec, and open to any memory provider. But Black said that AMD has worked nearly with SG Hynix to co-define not just the interface only the physical material used. "The dispute is that we're much closer to these guys than ahead," he said, referring to the physical proximity of the two chips. "That agency that the crucial set they pick has to interact with our corporate set, operating room we could fetch up with a reliableness challenge."

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/423196/amd-reveals-gameplay-benchmarks-for-radeon-fury-nano.html

Posted by: mcgrathextured.blogspot.com